Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srinidhi Varadarajan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Srinidhi Varadarajan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ACADEMIC, has been tagged as having notability problems for four years with no additional sources to support notability added. Rusf10 (talk) 04:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I cleaned this up for the debate so that at least it describes his current status rather than being out of date, but that doesn't mean I think the article should be kept. He was once a promising academic but WP:TOOSOON for academic notability; now he seems to have left academia to become a startup founder and executive, but is again WP:TOOSOON for notability that way. More specifically, the citation counts for his academic work are too low (in a high-citation discipline) for WP:PROF#C1, the MIT Review piece from that time is too slight by itself for WP:GNG notability, and I can't find subsequent in-depth independent sourcing to support notability for his startup work. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. notable as neither WP:PROF nor as a businessman. DGG ( talk ) 05:45, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete I don't see the coverage to meet WP:GNG or any accomplishments that meet any other notability standards.Sandals1 (talk) 04:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.