Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spankles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as patent nonsense, intentional hoax/vandalism, etc. Stifle (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spankles

Wikipedia is not a dictionary; prodded, but contested. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 04:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Almost no unique Google hits. Possibly a hoax. Aplomado - U T C 04:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems a slang definition, as much it could be moved to Transwikied to Wikidict. -- ReyBrujo
Transwiki. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 09:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable and hoax. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Obvious nonsense/hoax. The original editor's username is "Spankles," and said editor added "Historical Context- Coming Soon!!" after seeing that the article was up for deletion. Hell, User:Spankles's edit summary when he added that section reads "in the process of drafting the historical context"- you know, like how the Constitution was "drafted," a.k.a. "made up." The fact that no web resource exists that backs up the editor's claim is further proof that it's just somebody messing around. -- Kicking222 14:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional comment I'm not claiming that the Constitution doesn't exist or is a farce, just... well, hopefully, you get the idea. Just kill this "article" on "spankles." That's the point. -- Kicking222 14:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Transwiki to Wiktionary. Buchanan-H e rmit™..SCREAM!!!.... 00:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.