Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Adam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Adam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG standards. Quick Google search found 0 hits, aside from an Instagram website (which, for obvious reasons isn't a reliable source.) Sarrail (talk) 01:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. Sarrail (talk) 01:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find anything substantial. A search in French might help but not every player in a notable orchestra will be notable themselves. BuySomeApples (talk) 06:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and France. Shellwood (talk) 12:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for total lack of RIS. Mccapra (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No article should be nominated for deletion with the justification of a "Quick Google search" when the guidelines call for a range of searches. We should only consider deleting something if someone bothers to check notability as per WP:BEFORE CT55555(talk) 14:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Quick" is a subjective term, so a better path is to ask the nominator for more info. Your "Keep" vote implies that Ms. Adam is notable. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion if she is notable. I am arguing against deleting based on quick google searches, because that is not what our guidelines call for. I consider this to be a procedural keep argument. CT55555(talk) 17:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: a discussion about how to do better WP:BEFORE searches is occurring here and I am ready to update my vote once they are done. Thanks to the nominator for taking my hint. CT55555(talk) 18:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - She is indeed a member of several professional orchestras, but is only ever listed as a member and she has received no independent coverage for any of her own achievements or career path. She does not inherit notability from her organizations. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.