Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigurd Legion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sigurd Legion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not demonstrably notable-single mention of one of many splinter groups--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - News and Books immediately found nothing aside from one of the current sources and there's nothing to suggest this is independently notable. I would've suggested moving elsewhere but there's no good target. SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There are potential merges at British National Front (since it's supposed to be a protest group or something) or UK Neo-Nazism or something similar, I guess, but there is no indication that this group is notable. I hope it doesn't become so. Hithladaeus (talk) 17:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.