Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiallia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Withdrawn in order to enforce previous consensus. Since I'm not an admin, I can't protect, so it's at WP:RFPP. (non-admin closure) Ansh6 6 6 09:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shiallia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Forgotten Realms through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. BOZ (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and protect- this article was previously ~~redirected~~ merged to List of Forgotten Realms deities as a result of consensus at a community discussion. It was undone by an IP editor without a word, as part of a reversion spree. It should be put back the way it was and protected to avoid redirection again being undone on the sly. Reyk _YO! 05:28, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect List of Forgotten Realms deities. The info is verifiable in authoritative sources and the topic is a reasonable search term. Per WP:PRESERVE, merging of verifiable topics is preferable to deletion and WP:ATD-M seems to apply here, Pages about non-notable fictional elements are generally merged into list articles or articles covering the work of fiction in which they appear. --Mark viking (talk) 05:50, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and protect per Reyk. Other articles which were part of the same consensus and restored by the same IP should also be protected.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
the multiple restorations by IPs are troubling. the other articles improperly recreated by the IP also need to be converted back to redirects and locked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge per BOZ. Hihidufgh (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- since BOZ identified no policies or guidelines for the basis of his !vote, your "per BOZ" carries the exact same weight when analyzing to determine policy consensus, ie none. care to elaborate?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw - Folken de Fanel asked that I withdraw it so that the original consensus for the redirect can be enforced. It doesn't seem like anyone is fighting over the other articles, so it should be fine to do so with this one as well. TTN (talk) 12:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. This AfD seems to be heading towards a merge to the list anyway, so I don't there will be any objection to enforcing the previous consensus. Reyk _YO! 21:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.