Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shay Lynn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shay Lynn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. No independent reliable sourcing. No sourcing for biographical content. Escapes speedy deletion only because of its unsourced claim of winning a non-notable award from a non-notable awardgiver. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No verifiable objective claim of notability. Career summary appears to be the performer's IMDb filmography embellished with generous quantities of original research. No reliable sources whatsoever to support the content. No independent RS coverage found in search. No real claim of passing PORNBIO. No support for passing GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's nothing remotely remarkable about her. In fact, the article may qualify for speedy deletion under A7. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 11:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with MShabazz, this looks like it could be a WP:SPEEDY delete under A7. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable pornographic actress.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.