Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sesh Jibon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. Daniel (talk) 04:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sesh Jibon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification and moved back to mainspace without source improvements. Everything falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA or is otherwise unreliable. A WP:BEFORE shows a bunch of churnalism based on the announcement of the film and the trainler release, but nothing that could be considered significant coverage. Attempted to DRAFTIFY as an WP:ATD hoping more sources would come out once it is released, but here we are. CNMall41 (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India, Rajasthan, and West Bengal. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: or draftify until more sources are available. Present sourcing, notability of cast and director are strong indications this may be considered notable, even if, ’technically’, the threshold will probably only be indisputedly reached in a couple of weeks. Opposed to deletion. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, "may be considered notable" and "notable" are two different things. This is becoming ad nauseam. Can you point out the sources that show this IS notable? --CNMall41 (talk) 22:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The page have reputed media references. Few media links are Bengali publications that might be semi known. But the film is notable and should be keep at main space. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arshadkhanwriter (talk • contribs) 05:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Arshadkhanwriter (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Which references specifically? --CNMall41 (talk) 05:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify for being too soon. Prof.PMarini (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.