Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sephi Hakubi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Rje 14:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page appears to be pure vanity created by the subject. CapitalR 04:42, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this and also Sushicrowd. Danny Lilithborne 04:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Unsure that Sephi Hakubi should be deleted as information was gathered by blogs and interviews, information pertains more to future events rather than current and past facts. Article does not fit criteria for musician's article, at best make article standard or own class. +Add notes and citations to prove notability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.38.214.9 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Regarding the statement, "information pertains more to future events rather than current and past facts," Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. What may happen in the future does not justify an article. Fan1967 13:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sushicrowd as it is an established independent label and project organization. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.38.214.9 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sushicrowd has not been nominated. Yet. Fan1967 17:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO. ~ PseudoSudo 06:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanity. No verification of notability. Anyone can set up a website and give away MP3's. Fan1967 13:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanity Page. (Steve 16:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]
- Suspend Article established too soon. Purpose: To provide detail on broken links. Deleting article per interviewer, holding on suspend status.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.95.119.36 (talk • contribs) who also tried to blank the main article.
- Comment "Suspend" has no meaning in an AfD discussion. Either the article's going to be deleted, or it's not. What is it that you're tying to say? Fan1967 20:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not enough information to provide for nobility yet. Article was written to mend broken link. (User:sephihakubi 12:40, 15 May 2006 (HST))
- Delete Even the author of this article (User:sephihakubi) agrees it should be deleted. --CapitalR 23:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.