Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seelyhoo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While the voting is split, I am weighting Atlantic306's assertion of a pass at WP:NMUSIC criterion 4, supported by a reliable source, more heavily. I will make some effort to trim any promotional or subjective content from the article. GirthSummit (blether) 11:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seelyhoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability through substantial secondary sources. I can find two reviews on blogs but I’m not sure these are enough to indicate notability. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.