Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara A. Stires

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sara A. Stires

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

struggling to see GNG as being met. Award is not sufficient to meet ANYBIO and the sources in the article largely do not offer significant coverage and only mention the subject in passing or don't establish her as notable outside of having served in the military and received a relatively minor award (when considering notability). Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 12:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't in my view meet GNG. Intothat darkness 14:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
comment significant coverage in "Celebrating Navy Women: Perseverance & Achievements"; military times; billings times. = meets GNG --Emailmope (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two sentences in a U.S. Navy publication is not significant coverage. Mztourist (talk) 08:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete two sentences no where is significant coverage, especially when we are dealing with a naval publication talking about people who were in the navy, so that the indepedence of the publication is in question. Plus GNG requires multiple significant sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.