Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sana al-Sayegh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sana al-Sayegh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E applies. Mccapra (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. BPL1E states that significance of an event or the individual's role is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources. I easily found references that were created years after the event. For example "A History of Modern Israel", by Colin Shindler - 2013 as well as Jihad in Palestine: Political Islam and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. - By Shaul Bartal, 2015Marokwitz (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: there was some writing about her (mostly in Israeli papers) in 2007, (about her alleged conversion (forced or not)): since then: nothing, nix, nada. Clear WP:BLP1E, Huldra (talk) 22:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note this statement is false, I easily found references from 2013 and 2015 . Marokwitz (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. She fails the professor test because she has not contributed anything of note to scholarship, her role is that of an administrator and teacher, and the university at which she teaches is private and not known for its scholarship. As far as the controversy back in 2007, it seems to have been merely a news outrage, not anything of lasting effect. I'm willing to change my mind if English sources can be found to show significant coverage beyond her conversion. Bearian (talk) 18:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E and failure of WP:NACADEMIC.4meter4 (talk) 18:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- If she is indeed Dean, she holds a position higher than a professor (in the European sense) and ought to be notable, but the current article says nothing substantial of her academic career. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.