Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ST Andromedae (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ST Andromedae

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure to meet notability criteria in WP:NASTRO. It exists just as a database entry. Psyluke (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NASTCRIT. Not naked eye, not discovered before 1850, not in a catalogue of high historical importance, no popular coverage, no technical coverage specific to this star or a small number of stars including this one. There are several dozen papers and catalogues mentioning this star, but that turns out to be largely because it is a carbon star and Hipparcos star so it shows up in a lot of listings. As a relatively bright, at least at maximum, carbon star it seems like there should be enough material for an article but I couldn't come up with it. Lithopsian (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.