Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rush trivia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nothing to do here. The nomination isn't convincing on its merits, and there's no consensus to delete the material. Merge and delete is impossible because it breaks the GFDL by eliminating evidence of authorship. If you want to merge then you don't need approval here to do it. Mackensen (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rush trivia

I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance, especially items of unimportant information. This puts the article in direct conflict with my understanding of the following Wikipedia guidelines:

. Articles title is assumes that the information therin is trivial, violating NPOV
. If we are to assume that the articles information is indeed trivial then it is violating Imporance.
. Finally being that a trivia list is inherintly a list of random facts, this article is in violation of What Wikipedia is not.

Some or all of the information in this artile may be good however, it should be integrated into proper places within established articles. For advice on how this may be accomplished you might want to look at: Wikipedia:Trivia and User:GK/On adding trivia to the main body of an article. The_stuart 17:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and merge. with the Rush in popular culture article. Both were created during the Rush FA process. At that time they were deemed "keepers" as they could easily be expanded.
Merge and delete per nom. Caveat lector 18:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Rush in popular culture. Shouldn't take much to turn it into a proper article to satisfy everyone --KaptKos 19:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect into Rush in popular culture, although I'm not the biggest fan of that article. -- Kicking222 19:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BONUS RUSH TRIVIA! I'm related (by law) to Geddy Lee. He's my aunt's first cousin. -- Kicking222 19:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Rush in popular culture. Once done the article can be rearranged into prose format. It wouldn't be very difficult to do. Wisdom89 20:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per above. --Joelmills 01:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Joelmills, KaptKos et al. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. — Philwelch t 07:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.