Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riot magazine
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanispamcruftisement for a magazine claiming an Australia-wide circulation of 30,000. According to its website, it's only 5 issues old. Originally prodded by me, prod tag removed without any explanation. Coredesat talk! 06:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's nothing here that can even be edited into NPOV. Exists only as WP:VSCA. --Pleather 07:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 08:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:VSCA. MER-C 09:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - pure spam. Look at the history. They never learn, do they? BTLizard 13:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Longhair 00:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - if the distribution figure can be proven (and I'll admit that it sounds like rather a tall tale), then I think this is notable enough. Unfortunately, the CAB website seems to want authentication [1]. Lankiveil 09:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per nom, unconvincing spam. RFerreira 04:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.