Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remark Holdings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:33, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remark Holdings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An apparent UPE creation ([1]) edited heavily by other apparent UPE/COI editors ([2], [3]) with repeated attempts to paste their press-kit into the article ([4], [5]). The most recent edits by an IP, which have since been revision-deleted by Moneytrees for copyright infringement, attempted to do the same, while purging any potentially controversial content. Sources do not establish that the company meets WP:CORPDEPTH, and I don't think we should do them the favour of a big search for sources and a rewrite: Our response to paid editing should not be "buy one, get one free"; we should not be rewarding unethical marketing efforts like this in any way. Hence delete per WP:NOBOGOF and WP:TNT, with no prejudice against recreation by someone who a) is not paid or b) has disclosed their conflict of interest. Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.