Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainer Weichbrodt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rainer Weichbrodt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphaned biography appears to be WP:VANISPAM (given its creator's username) with all WP:PRIMARY sourcing. While subject may be accomplished, he does not appear to meet WP:GNG, and nor do the two companies listed (think!tank and Management Institut Dortmund) appear to meet WP:COMPANY. The only possible criterion I can see is WP:ANYBIO#1, but it's not clear that his Wissensmanager des Jahres is particularly notable (it appears to have only been issued for a few years) -- and even if it happened to be considered notable, it appears to be better as a list of winners per WP:BLP1E. ^~~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~~ 14:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 15:41, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 15:41, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as currently questionable, delete at best for now. SwisterTwister talk 23:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.