Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Elliott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Elliott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks to me like if it's written in the style of an overglorified Linkedin page that does not hint notability other than a tiny part of her cycling as it seems. Going into that, only two reliable sources but one source is of local interest and the other mention is about the event and briefly about her. In all, fails all 4 criteria of WP:NCYCLING for women.

What she achieved in Zwift and the Brompton does not count as notability as the latter is not a UCI event. Donnie Park (talk) 09:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Donnie Park nailed it. The only thing I'll add is that the premier result is winning a manufacturer-sponsored fun race for folding bicycles where the riders where business attire. I'm certain that doesn't qualify under WP:NATHLETE Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - fails WP:NCYCLING, nothing else notable.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.