Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornstar Pets (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pornstar Pets

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM: I have not found any reviews by established critics or other significant external coverage or recognition for this independent documentary film about pornographic performers who own animals. It was kept at AfD in 2005, in part because its IMDB entry was taken as proof of notability. Cheers, gnu 57 00:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 00:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 00:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 00:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to the lack of a credible claim of significance as well as verifiability and notability. @echo off 03:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of independent coverage (based on what I can see from a number of rather painful searches...). Interesting how AfD criteria have evolved in the last decade and a half; virtually none of the Keep arguments from the first AfD would hold any water today. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of coverage in reliable sources as for example there are no rs reviews in the external reviews section at IMDB and no critics reviews at its Rotten Tomatoes listing, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per previously mentioned reasons.--NL19931993 (talk) 13:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.