Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pollyanna Woodward (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pollyanna Woodward

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see anything here which specifically indicates notability. Being a presenter for a show by itself is not sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 23:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep she passes GNG. There are more sources that can be added including: [1], [2], [3], [4], etc. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, notable enough Matt14451 (talk) 13:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there's more there than just "Being a presenter for a show", and sourced. for (;;) (talk) 19:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Megalibrarygirl. Meets WP:GNG. Hmlarson (talk) 01:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.