Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platformic (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:55, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Platformic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Certainly time for another AfD especially how Wikipedia is not what it is since 2010, my own searches are not finding anything actually convincing and there's essentially nothing else better. SwisterTwister talk 21:13, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it certain that it is time for an AfD? What has changed since 2010? Unscintillating (talk) 23:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a micro-stub of an advertorial on an unremarkable private company. Coverage does not meet COPRDEPTH and nothing there to sustain an encyclopedia entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment --Network World appears to be the most in-depth coverage, but it's still insufficient for an encyclopedia article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.