Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixel Innovations
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 11:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Pixel Innovations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article is not sufficiently notable to warrant an article. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 03:35, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Advertising for non-notable terminal software. (Brings back memories, doesn't it?) Starting from humble origins with a team of two, Francis Carden and Derek Cahusac de Caux, Pixel achieved a sales turnover of $200,000 in its first year.... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.