Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pieter Korteweg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Bazj (talk) 03:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pieter Korteweg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of many "x was a philatelist who signed the Roll of Distinguished Philatelists" articles. It would seem that their notability is limited to being a redlink in the roll's article, and their sole reference is being listed at the Roll of Distinguished Philatelists Trust. I raise this discussion as a representative for the whole class created en masse. Bazj (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - The article has been improved and is no longer representative of the many stubs created. While I'm glad that the article has been improved it's regrettable that a discussion of the many stubs is no longer possible. I don't intend chasing them all AfD by AfD. Bazj (talk) 03:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will comment further later, but my initial thoughts are that simply being on the Roll is enough. It's the premier award internationally in philately and you don't get on it unless you have already won gold medals from exhibiting internationally, written significant books etc. I grant you the articles are the stubyist of stubs but whenever one has been challenged before they have always proved highly expandable and usually with multiple points of notability. Check out my Did You Knows for evidence. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
listed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philately#AfD. Bazj (talk) 15:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RDP. Costerus Medal. Over 2000 articles on Dutch philately. Wrote some of the standard works on Dutch marcophily. I am sure there is more too for Dutch readers. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.