Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Rowley (disambiguation)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Peter Rowley (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One notable Peter, another not so notable and one partial match can all be handled by one or two hatnotes in Peter Rowley. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep there's definitely a primary topic, but 3 other entries readers may be looking for, and this page then might be WP:USEFUL for them. All 3 entries meet MOS:DABMENTION or have an article, and there is also a valid see also. Boleyn (talk) 07:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Boleyn. This potentially helps the reader. BD2412 T 16:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.