Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Baxendell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 02:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Baxendell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prominent businessman, but the sourcing does not show that they meet WP:GNG. Was sent to draft for improvement, but returned immediately without improvement. Similar to Frederick Stephens (businessman), who will also be nominated for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:ANYBIO as he has "received a well-known and significant award or honor": received the CBE in 1972 and was knighted in 1981 Plenty of coverage in newspaper archives , for example British Newspaper Archive Piecesofuk (talk) 13:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Both a knight and a CBE, both of which have been held again and again to pass WP:ANYBIO #1. Also chairman of one of the biggest oil companies in the world. Ridiculous nomination. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~I support @Onel5969's nomination as the sourcing doesn't support You've listed two relevant sources in your comment - why not edit the Article to add these?~~ MetricMaster (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak keep Satisfies WP:ANYBIO as he has "received a well-known and significant award or honour", however article needs additional verifiable cites~~ MetricMaster (talk) 09:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC) This user has made 47 edits to Wikipedia. Their contribution history shows that 38 of these were to AFD discussions. The account exists for votestacking and has been blocked.[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 13:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added additional refs from The Times and New York Times Piecesofuk (talk) 15:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 12:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:ANYBIO, due to the CBE and knighthood. Article has improved since nomination, hopefully that continues. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.