Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentest-Tools
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or ask at WP:REFUND. Know that you will have to submit the article to WP:AFC for an editorial review. Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pentest-Tools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No WP:SUSTAINED establishment of notability with WP:RSes. Clearly promotional. Amigao (talk) 00:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Internet, and Romania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify or Delete: The sections Products, Awards and accolades, Services and Community contribution definitely have to be either rewritten (to avoid promotional material) or deleted outright. The rest of the article can be kept (especially if it can be unorphaned). Regards, SirBrahms (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- SirBrahms, @everyone, Please help me with any suggestions to improve the page, i'm willing to improve it in order to follow Wikipedia's guidelines.Ionutzmovie (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'd suggest trying to remove material that could be considered promotional first, and then making efforts to link this article in relevant pages (unorphan). I hope this helps set you on the right track to improving it. Regards, SirBrahms (talk) 20:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- SirBrahms, @everyone, Please help me with any suggestions to improve the page, i'm willing to improve it in order to follow Wikipedia's guidelines.Ionutzmovie (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Draft - I'm not seeing enough here to meet the GNG, although it might be close if there was more time to draft and improve with better sources. JMWt (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete — promotional, poorly sourced, despite the flood of cherry-picked links. — Biruitorul Talk 06:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete- Reads like a promotional for a company. Clearing falls under WP:NOTPROMO. RCSCott91 (talk) 15:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.