Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Teitgen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SKCRIT#4: Nomination by a blocked sockpuppet. (non-admin closure) Java Hurricane 15:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Teitgen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. No single source cited Jenyire2 20:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 20:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - did you make a WP:BEFORE within 11 minutes after creation ? Dozens of sources given. I suggest to withdraw it. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Case of editor not doing WP:Before raising AFD. Added reference from Journal Revue d histoire.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I just started the article and, to be sure, there is not a lot of info ou there on him. Still, considering his unique role during the Algerian War and the fact that there is an article on the French Wiki on Paul Teitgen, I vote to keep it Yosy (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep numerous sources, I have added 3 that I had to hand. Mztourist (talk) 03:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have added two further refs - sorry my French is very rusty. His father looks like a interesting story too, what I can make out!.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 05:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article is well-sourced and has significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. --Ashley yoursmile! 13:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is significant presence about this subject, hence meets WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Clearly notable. Furthermore, I would have thought that his status as a Prefect, which I think is a kind of local governor in the French system ought to be sufficient to make him notable, without more. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Kemalcan (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think we can conclude that the article is definitely a keeper! And a note of thanks to all of you - in no time after I created the article, I had several Wikipedians contributing in with information and references. A great example of article creation and this is what Wikipedia is all about!! Bravo to us!!! Yosy (talk) 05:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.