Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parnówko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Invalid nomination. From the nominator's user page: "I used to work on nominating articles for deletion, but due to my misunderstanding of the deletion policy, I was forced to quit that role and now work on expanding stub articles". Geschichte (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parnówko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOLAND JTZegers (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Mccapra (talk) 21:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I think there is pretty substantial evidence this town exists, as just one example, there is a weather report for it here: [1]. As such it passes GEOLAND. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Named town, passes GEOLAND. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly passes WP:GEOLAND. SportingFlyer T·C 19:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.