Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Status
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 00:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Open Status (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. No reliable sources. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 19:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no RS coverage, and article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No indication of notability, zero sources, and a Google search turned up nothing. --Biblioworm 04:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
- Reluctant delete - can't find enough sources to justify WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.