Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Icecat
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 17:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Open Icecat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spam-flavoured and withou anything that looks like a solid enough source to establish notability. Normally I enjoy copyediting rubbish like this, biut sometimes there's no way that a copyedit would leave anything at all.TheLongTone (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.