Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online Football Manager
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Chick Bowen 00:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Online Football Manager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Nominate Resembles a guide for the game, also does not take a neutral point of view Ozoo 14:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Article quality, however poor, is no reason to delete. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 15:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have written and edited quite a lot of this entry. I have not had time to clean it up. I am encouraging others to edit the entry to give it a neutral point of view. Obviously any entry on a game would seem like a guide. You could make the same argument about an entry on [[football]user:blueslipper[. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blueslipper ([[User talk:BlueslipperBlueslipper 00:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)|talk]] • contribs) 00:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 08:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB, regardless of the quality of the prose (which reads like an advertisement), it appears non-notable. Specifically, there is no evidence that it satisfies the "subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself" rule. Qwghlm 09:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 19:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It helps people that want to know stuff about OFM
- Rewrite м info 00:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Qwghlm... Addhoc 14:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.