Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Berkeley Beagles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Old Berkeley Beagles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Directory listings and trivial mentions are nowhere near enough. Newspaper archive search produced nothing useful. AusLondonder (talk) 12:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations, and England. AusLondonder (talk) 12:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete for similar reasons to those I gave for the Isle of Wight Foxhounds article. We need to slim down our excessive coverage of minor Anglosphere minutiae. RobinCarmody (talk) 23:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. However, I do not agree with the reasoning above. We do not need to slim down our excessive coverage of minor Anglosphere minutiae, but rather increase coverage of non-anglosphere topics. --Bduke (talk) 04:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.