Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Kumar Singal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neeraj Kumar Singal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG. See WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME. Hitro talk 06:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 06:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 06:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 06:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree with nom. No evidence of notability and fails WP:GNG Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 08:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only two RS discuss the subject independently [1], [2], however they fails to satisfy one of notability criteria. No awards, no historical contribution, no notable work. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nom notable businessman in India. VocalIndia (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A businessman doing business. Nothing that rises to to meeting the level of GNG. --Kbabej (talk) 00:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable and weak citations. appears to have been translated by an author who doesn't have access to Grammarly. Miaminsurance (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing in article is about third-party significant coverage, and nothing implies general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Failed to pass WP:GNG Padavalam🌂 ► 10:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current available sources are not enough to make him qualify for WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG. Spudlace (talk) 06:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Coverage is weak and notable reliable sources not found. TheDreamBoat (talk) 09:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.