Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy DiNardo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 00:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nancy DiNardo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:NPOL as she hasn't held state-wide public office, at the very least. Bedivere (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, notable state party chair, meets WP:GNG Andre🚐 22:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This person, notable primarily as the chair of a state-level political party is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and the article isn't referenced well enough to get them over WP:GNG. This is not what it takes to make a political operative notable enough for an encyclopedia article. --Bedivere (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- She's notable as the first woman to hold her position and has WP:SIGCOV in RS. She has also held several other positions. Andre🚐 22:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This person, notable primarily as the chair of a state-level political party is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and the article isn't referenced well enough to get them over WP:GNG. This is not what it takes to make a political operative notable enough for an encyclopedia article. --Bedivere (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Connecticut. Shellwood (talk) 22:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Articles in New York Times and Connecticut Post are clearly enough to meet WP:GNG. WP:NPOL states that meeting WP:GNG is enough. BruceThomson (talk) 09:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — in addition to the existing sources that qualify as SIGCOV in RS, there are others I found after some searches: In the Connecticut Examiner (Sept 2021), The Westchester County Business Journal (June 2020), and possible The Day (Mar 2021) (the latter being more obscure and paywalled). WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 16:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.