Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mporia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 00:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mporia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP, notability not established for 5 years, not referenced. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. Seems to be a pretty straightforward (failed) service provider. Nothing of note for Wikipedia, as far as I can tell. -- BenTels (talk) 16:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Difficult to find real coverage among the chaff of press releases and pseudo-news based on press releases, but I did find these: [1], [2]. Not a strong case for keeping admittedly. --Michig (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Here's some additional independent coverage - [3], [4], [5], [6]. -—Kvng 20:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.