Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael A Schuman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael A Schuman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this author/journalist is notable per WP:CREATIVE. Only information found appears to be primary sources (e.g., newspaper articles by him). No book reviews or other information to base a WP:BLP article found in reliable sources. No indication that the awards won convey notability. Kinu ^t/_c 01:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He has been published extensively, so his name gets lots of Google hits. However, coverage of him in reliable sources consists mostly of one line identifiers of him as a freelance writer, but no in-depth coverage of him as the topic. Cullen328 (talk) 04:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. NATJA gives out an awful lot of awards and don't have a Wikipedia article so that doesn't exactly convey notability. Hut 8.5 14:26, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.