Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media service provider

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Media service provider

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This generic term has been sourceless for 12 years and quite frankly it’s obsolete. Trillfendi (talk) 20:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:41, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Articles should have references and this doesn't.Catfurball (talk) 19:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research.--94rain ^Talk 08:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like OR without any real substance. Mccapra (talk) 05:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.