Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malina Pardo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Malina Pardo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has earned at least four caps for the Puerto Rico women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. This is a good piece, but is not independent as it's from her school's newspaper. JTtheOG (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Puerto Rico, and North Carolina. JTtheOG (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. WP:TOOSOON. Pro-club academy player who's still playing as a college graduate; injured in college play in 2021 and national team play in 2022, redshirted 2022. Might become notable, might not. -Socccc (talk) 15:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Separately, student-run media are considered WP:RS (specifically WP:RSSM) if editorially independent in content, which Niner Times appears to be via its student-run editorial board. That linked piece isn't an athletic department press release. A more relevant guideline against notability is in RSSM: "A topic which can be sourced exclusively to student media, with no evidence of wider coverage in mass market general interest media, is not likely to be viewed as notable." -Socccc (talk) 15:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Student-run media are absolutely not considered independent of topics related to their school. See the unanimous consensus here. I've clarified this at RSSM. JoelleJay (talk) 21:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sourcing does not establish GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 21:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.