Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mairaj-ul-Hasan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mairaj-ul-Hasan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, nothing in searches, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per nom. Macktheknifeau (talk) 08:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NCRIC having played in five first-class matches. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has played 5 FC matches, but I cannot find any significant coverage. Sources may exist offline or in Pakistani sources but in a search I have been unable to find any. Because his 5 FC matches were for 3 different teams there is no suitable WP:ATD in this case so using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY were players with one or a few matches, but no coverage, are deleted/redirected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rugbyfan22 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has played five first class matches. Another example of an article which could definitely do with improvement, but passes WP:NCRIC. Hard to find sources for an otherwise notable subject shouldn't be a reason for automatic deletion, it should be a reason for editors to work harder to improve, rather than to destroy others' work. DevaCat1 (talk) 10:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article completely and totally fails notability guidelines.18:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete WP:NCRIC is notoriously bad at determining when a sports bio will pass WP:GNG. This is sourced to a single statistical page, clearly failing WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 16:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.