Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Charters-Reid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Charters-Reid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable only as an as yet unelected candidate in a future election. As always, this does not get a person into Wikipedia in and of itself -- if you cannot show and properly source that he was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article for some other reason independent of his candidacy, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. But nothing here shows preexisting notability for anything -- and the sourcing is the usual mix of primary sources and WP:ROUTINE local campaign coverage. Bearcat (talk) 02:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with nomination. Jack N. Stock (talk) 03:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.