Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luka (Verbal Vets)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was USERFY —Wh o uk (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Luka (Verbal Vets)

Article has apparently been written by its subject. I don't think this really asserts notability and it smacks of a vanity article to me. "Natural Born Spitters" isn't in Allmusic, either, and generally doesn't seem to get a lot in the way of Google hits. Delete. -- Captain Disdain 16:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that there is a whole bunch of pages redirecting to this one, such as Łukasz Krawczyk, Luka (NBS), Luka NBS and so forth. -- Captain Disdain 16:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:AUTO, WP:NOT free web host MartinRe 16:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you mean talking about "free web host," MartinRe? — Luka (Verbal Vets) 05:32, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - See WP:NOT. It's a shorthand way of saying that the content is more appropiate for a personal web wite, (which wikipedia isn't) as it's written by the subject and doesn't appear to be notable enough for an encylopedia. It's common to use comments of a short reference to policies, which saves a lot of verbose typing. Regards, MartinRe 13:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and userfy per above. Vanity, spam, non-notable, freeweb space, etc. -- Kicking222 18:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh, what shall I do now? First and foremost I thank y'all for all your valuable remarks regarding my article. On the other hand, I ask you for understanding, mates..I'm absolute beginner and have never written any article for Wikipedia before... Luka (Verbal Vets) 22:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy. Don't take it personally, but there's a lot of articles that go through the deletion process so people tend to be terse. This article isn't quite what Wikipedia is for (read WP:NOT) and would be better placed on your user page. Fagstein 02:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per Fagstein, and delete all the redirects. Stifle (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank y'all very much, I got it. You're absolutely right. Now I see my mistakes, and understand all your remarks, thanks. I have to respect Wikipedia's terms and conditions..so if you make a decision, and my article is supposed to be deleted/edited, I really don't mind it. Please do the right things. Shalom... — Luka (Verbal Vets) 16:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy userfy per author's request. Fagstein 19:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please don't get me wrong...of course I don't want it to get deleted but do I have any other choice? Do I, anyway? — Luka (Verbal Vets) 05:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Well, not really, unless you could find a way to turn it into an article. Userfying it would take the article as it is now and make it a subpage of your user page on Wikipedia, separating it from the "encyclopedia" part and putting it in the part designed for Wikipedia users such as yourself. Fagstein 08:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy. Zaxem 12:39, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.