Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightstorm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Web (series). The Bushranger One ping only 12:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lightstorm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am a big fan of Hamiltion, but unlike his books, which are likely all notable, his short stories do not seem to be. Not unless they won an award or otherwise generated coverage, and this one does not seem to provide any indication of this, clearly failing WP:N. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SpacemanSpiff 14:12, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to The Web (series). Lightstorm is a reasonable search term so a redirect to The Web (series) is warranted. Merging the one short sentence of story description will not unbalance the target article, and will perhaps encourage short descriptions for the other stories. The sources [1], [2] could serve as verifications of the description. --Mark viking (talk) 03:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the only question is whether to redirect. I don;t think we usually redirect short story titles unless it's a very famous author, or the story itself is so well known as to be almost notable. I don;t see evidence for this. DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge I agree with Mark viking (talk). It's an ideal solution. scope_creep talk 19:11, 06 October 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.