Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Large Animal Games (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 04:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Large Animal Games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:CORP. Entirely non notable online game company. All sources are primary or non reliable, such as Facebook, etc. Promotional, but not to the point of being eligible for CSD G11. Article was deleted once at AfD for notability, but given both that the original AfD was eight years ago and that this current incarnation has existed since 2007, I feel CSD G4 is inappropriate as well. Safiel (talk) 04:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It looks like there was a play by the same name by Steve Yockey, so there will be some false positives for that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. It looks like there were some reviews for their Color Zen game and its spinoff Color Zen Kids, enough to where they have a Metacritic score for each one. There are some articles here and there like this article and this one, but by large most of the focus is on Color Zen. There's just enough here to where I'd argue for a weak keep as an overall article about the company as opposed to just creating an article for the game Color Zen itself, although I do want to note that I don't think that there should be a separate article for the game. This is kind of a "one or the other" type of situation. I also want to note that I deleted a lot of information on the article that was fairly promotional and looked like it'd probably be copyvio from one place or another. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:37, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.