Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kloodle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kloodle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find enough reliable refs to show company notability. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 20:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was able to find only one independent source. Might eventually be notable, but not quite yet, unless there is something I am missing. -Pax Verbum 21:28, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and draft/userfy if anyone wants but my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found no considerably good coverage with the best being this and this. SwisterTwister talk 17:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.