Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Deco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

King Deco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has released one digital song and has had a few mentions on the interwebz--that's it. Not notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the nominator has evaluated things correctly. A few blogs have noticed that the young woman is attractive, as are millions of women. The moniker is clever, but that does not establish notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:03, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.