Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Price

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 13:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Price

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So...he's a radio host and likes to write autobiographies. Sourcing is primary and weak for a BLP, looks like it falls short of WP:GNG (note this has had longstanding COI issues since creation, as noted on the talk) Widefox; talk 21:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (soliloquize) @ 21:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this fails WP:42 for lacking any reliable sources at all. On an aside, it's not clear that he's done anything notable (see WP:GNG). Bearian (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am the subject of the article. What happened is that one of my children read this article and noticed that it needed additional "help" and he decided to do it on my computer and surprise me with them. Those were the sources he found. The article has existed (I think) for around 10 years. I'm an author, frequent guest on major media, writer for Huffington Post, etc. I apologize for any violation we may have made of your terms of use. It was not intentional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.12.190.96 (talk) 17:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.