Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joint Inter-Domain Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joint Inter-Domain Management

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I mistakenly put this up for PROD not spotting that it had been prodded before. I’m bringing it to AfD as I can’t see anything to support notability. Mccapra (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I expanded the article and added RS. This collaboration resulted in a standard, and a simple WP:BEFORE-style search shows quite a few sources. Four of the sources now in the article are reliable and independent of the JIDM spec authors and go in some depth on the topic. I think there is enough sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG. Because it is the spec that is important, renaming to Joint Inter-Domain Management Specification might be considered. If others disagree on notability, this is still verifiable material and per our policy WP:ATD, alternatives to deletion are preferred for verifiable material. One alternative is a merge to X/Open, the co-originator of the JIDM, or The Open Group, the ones who published the spec. In any case, I do not recommend deletion. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 03:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw. With thanks to @Mark viking: I’d like to withdraw this nomination.Mccapra (talk) 07:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.