Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodi McLeary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jodi McLeary

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any significant coverage so she fails GNG Dougal18 (talk) 15:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Scotland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it's WP:TOOSOON. She is 16 years old and a recent academy graduate, as explained in this August 2022 BBC Sport article (which I would characterise as a "mention"). She has had some exciting moments in her short career and will no doubt go on to do brilliant things, but this article could easily be recreated at that point, also once there is SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources to back it up. Cielquiparle (talk) 15:19, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:SPORTSBASIC. Clearly a case of WP:TOOSOON.4meter4 (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree TOOSOON. Oaktree b (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - At the moment this is a clear case of TOOSOON, but she could very well merit an article in the future as her career progresses. Dunarc (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - plenty of coverage on the Rangers website but this is not independent and fails WP:SPORTBASIC, which says team sites are generally not regarded as independent of the subject. Aside from the BBC mention above, I also found a passing mention in The Scotsman. We need something more detailed to show GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clear case of WP:TOOSOON. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TOOSOON. Stuff like this suggests she may have a career that generates WP:SIRS coverage, but I can't find any of it yet. Jogurney (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.