Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Wilhelmsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Wilhelmsen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable UFOlogist. This was speedied a couple of months back and has been rewritten to try to claim notability, which it probably does at least well enough to escape speedying again. Nonetheless, I can't find evidence of genuine notability in reliable sources. He was apparently once interviewed on a late night AM radio show about the paranormal, but I'm just not seeing any coverage of Wilhelmsen to establish notability at all. Oh, and his book was self-published through a vanity press. Glenfarclas (talk) 08:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appearance on Coast To Coast AM not enough to merit own article. Can't find the required multiple, independent reliable sources that would indicate notability. - LuckyLouie (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Keb25 (talk) 21:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.