Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jillian Parry Fry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I am not a fan of these articles but I see a Weak Keep consensus here after 3 relistings so this has to be brought to a close. But those preferring a Merge should take their argument to the article talk page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jillian Parry Fry

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG. The current sources lack the independent coverage needed to meet WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 00:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Beauty pageants, and Pennsylvania. Let'srun (talk) 00:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Week keep I suppose the Miss Teen USA is notable, but there is no sourcing in the article and I can't find any (it's from that very early internet era, so might not be found online). The rest seems rather non-notable, going to school, being a vegan.
Oaktree b (talk) 04:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sustained coverage for different reasons over 20 years – I've updated the article and added more references ... CJ [a Kiwi] in Oz 13:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Miss Teen USA 2000. We have coverage at the time for winning, which is really more about the notability of the event. The rest of the sources appear to be brief mentions and material written by the subject, not about the subject. Per WP:GNG and especially WP:NOPAGE, merge to the parent article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge and Redirect option vs. Keeping the article as is.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough WP:SIGCOV. McFilet O' Fish Fan (talk) 02:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per WP:ANYBIO#1 as a winner of a well known award. The fact that she gets only brief mentions doesn't disqualify her because sources can be tacked together under WP:BASIC. There was some (fairly inoffensive) personal information in the article that completely lacked sourcing and I deleted it conservatively out of privacy concerns - if it wasn't published elsewhere it probably shouldn't be publicised here. Oblivy (talk) 08:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Right now there's no consensus, closely leaning towards keep. Relisting for a final time to hopefully find that consensus. Any thoughts on the suggestion for Merge/Redirecting to Miss Teen USA 2000?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 01:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - I think the idea of merging into Miss Teen USA 2000 is wise. It seems that many of the winners do have their own page, though the lack of references & notable elements in Miss. Fry's article would make it well suited to a merge. A MINOTAUR (talk) 03:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.