Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Everett
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jeremy Everett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:ARTIST. No claim of notability. Nagol0929 (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Nagol0929 (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada, California, and Colorado. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete- WP:TOOSOON No significant coverage available to improve the article as written. Not in any notable exhibitions or collections. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.